Afraid of Aids and Kaposi's sarcoma?
A BRIEF HISTORY OF AIDS
In the precipitate 80's, doctors started seeing more and more people beside suppressed immune systems coming into emergency rooms with several opportunistic infections. These be primarily gay men and intravenous drug users. There was
nouns within the gay community and surrounded by the general population as more and more folks began dying of what be called AIDS: Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome.
In 1984, Robert Gallo, a research scientist working for the National Institute of Health (NIH), announced within a press conference that he had discovered the probable lead to of AIDS, and that it was a retrovirus next called HIV: Human
Immunodeficiency Virus. Without have published his findings for peer review he announced this to the press. The medium immediately run with it, and individuals began demanding funding into research into HIV, adjectives based on the assumption that
HIV is a sexually-transmitted pathogen that cause AIDS.
The gay community especially rallied and pushed for more AIDS funding and better coaching about 'safe sex'. In 1987 a drug call AZT was approved by the FDA for the treatment
of AIDS, and this begin a multi-billion dollar industry.
RETROVIRUSES DO NOT CAUSE DISEASE
HIV is a normal retrovirus. Its genetic composition does not differ deeply much from other retroviruses. No retrovirus has ever be shown to cause disease outside of a lab. Unlike tedious viruses, retroviruses do not annihilate their host cells. Retroviruses take place naturally inside of the cell of many animals, including humans. Retroviruses are see by many scientists to be fluently occurring parts of our cells. Retroviruses are not sexually-transmitted, but they are passed from mother to child. Retroviruses have been studied by the NIH extensively throughout the 70's within hopes that they would find a retrovirus that caused cancer. Because retroviruses do not murder cells, they be a perfect nominee for cancer, in which cell do not die but instead multiply rapidly.
Millions of dollars go into all of this research into retroviruses near nothing to show for it. Gallo himself tried to prove more than once that he have found a disease-causing retrovirus, only to be debunk by the scientific community. When AIDS appeared, Gallo and the NIH be already looking for a
disease that they could blame on a retrovirus, to justify adjectives of their wasted funding.
HIV HAS NEVER BEEN FOUND
HIV have never been isolated from human blood. What AIDS researchers hail as isolation of HIV is the finding of certain chemicals and enzymatic diversion that they claim indicates the presence of HIV. They find proteins and genetic material thought to come from HIV, or they find reverse transcriptase stir.
But none of these proteins, RNA strands, or enzyme activities are individual to HIV.
What most AIDS scientists research in their labs is a lab artifact. It is HIV i.e. created and grown in a lab, and it is thought to be impossible to tell apart thing that cause AIDS when it infects people.
THE TEST DOES NOT FIND HIV
The oral exam for HIV does not look for an actual virus in your blood. It looks for antibodies that will counter with a set of proteins that are produced by HIV. But none of these proteins are specific to HIV. Antibodies within the blood resulting
from other conditions can cross-react with the proteins contained by the HIV test. Blood must be diluted in the past being tested for HIV. Without dilution, adjectives blood samples would interview positive for HIV because we all own some antibodies that will cross-react with the examination. There are at least 66 factor that are known to
motive false positive results on an HIV test, including other infections, drug use, and sensitive anal sex. Having unprotected receptive anal sex cause your body to produce antibodies in response to semen.
These antibodies to semen can cross-react next to the proteins in the HIV question paper, producing a false positive result. In addition, relations of African descent have a sophisticated probability of
testing false positive, because they fluently have a greater array of antibodies in their blood.
NO GOLD STANDARD FOR HIV TESTING
HIV test are not standardized. This is because HIV has never be isolated from human blood, so there is no style to know how specific the tests are to HIV infection. The Food & Drug Administration (FDA) does not approve a single HIV
interview for the diagnosis of HIV infection. There are a variety of test, and the results are interpreted differently in different countries. So equal sample of blood could tryout positive in the United States while trialling negative contained by Europe. Another more expensive HIV test is the viral nouns test. Viral nouns
testing make use of PCR: polymerase chain recoil. It takes a thoroughly small amount of genetic material and make enough copies of it that you can detect it.
Dr. Kary Mullis, who won a Nobel prize for inventing PCR, is among the scientists who say-so that HIV does not cause AIDS. He claims that viral nouns testing is a misuse of PCR. PCR does not find isolated virus contained by the blood. It finds pieces of RNA strands thought to belong to HIV.
PRESENCE OF ANTIBODIES MEANS IMMUNITY
Usually, if you test positive for antibodies that medium that your immune system has effectively fought rotten a pathogen and you now enjoy immunity. But near the HIV test, the logic is reversed. Instead of purpose that you now own immunity to HIV, carrying out tests positive is said to mean that you are infected and your immune
system have failed to neutralize the virus. The great hope for abundant who believe that HIV causes AIDS is that researchers will some daylight develop a vaccine. But vaccines work by causing your body to produce antibodies specific to a pathogen.
If a vaccine for HIV be created, everyone who had the vaccine would consequently test positive for HIV on the non-specific antibody test now contained by use.
AZT SUPPRESSES THE IMMUNE SYSTEM
The original drug used to treat race with AIDS, call AZT, was not created for AIDS treatment. AZT be originally developed in the 70's as a chemotherapy drug for cancer patients, but it be not approved because it was determined to
be too toxic. Chemotherapy for cancer patients is controlled to a certain duration, while AZT and similar drugs are prescribed to AIDS patients for the rest of their lives. The study that front to FDA approval for AZT has very soon been shown to own been fraudulent. The packet for AZT says: "TOXIC. Toxic by
inhalation, within contact with skin and if swallowed. Wear suitable protective clothing." Among other side effects, AZT destroys the bone marrow of the body.
The justification doctors see an initial rise in their patients' T cell count after taking AZT is because the bone marrow is where on earth T cells are produced. AZT destroys the bone marrow and this releases more T cell from the marrow into the blood. Prolonged use of AZT has be shown to suppress the immune system and lower T cell counts. About 95% of AIDS-related deaths own occurred since the release of AZT.
ANTIRETROVIRAL SIDE EFFECT LEADING CAUSE OF DEATH
The newer protease inhibitors used contained by combo therapy are also a type of chemotherapy. They work by preventing the replication of DNA belonging to HIV. But these proteins are not specific to HIV, and the protease
inhibitors do not exclusively target HIV. The highest exact of death today for ancestors with AIDS is liver breakdown. Liver failure is not an AIDS-defining complaint, but it is a known side-effect of the protease inhibitors. AIDS patients can see the disappearance of some symptoms while taking the drug cocktails. This is because the drugs they are taking are worldwide poisons that
kill frequent microbes in the body that may be pathogenic, such as microbes and other viruses.
ANTIRETROVIRALS NOT PROVEN TO IMPROVE HEALTH
The drug companies claim that the release of protease inhibitors within 1996 was responsible for decrease deaths due to AIDS. But death from AIDS had already begin a declining trend three years back in 1993, and the introduction of
protease inhibitors did not significantly alter this trend. Studies are no longer comparing AIDS drugs beside a placebo. Now when they test a unknown antiretroviral drug they compare a group taking the new drug beside a group that is taking the elder drugs. There are no studies being done comparing the difference surrounded by health between ethnic group taking the AIDS medications and populace who are not taking the drugs, though many HIV positive relations lead forceful lives free of disease for many years, short taking AIDS medication.
CDC REDEFINES AIDS TO INCREASE NUMBERS
AIDS statistics can be very misleading. This is because of the oodles definitions for AIDS that enjoy been used by different countries and at different times.
Originally, surrounded by the United States you had to trial HIV positive and have one or more of the AIDS-defining illnesses to be counted as somebody beside AIDS. In 1993 the Center for Disease Control (CDC) expanded this definition to include
anyone who tested positive for HIV and had a T cell count of beneath 200. This nearly tripled the perceived number of AIDS cases in the US. Many of the those who have AIDS by this definition are without a flaw healthy, and would not be
considered to own AIDS if they moved to Canada.
AIDS IN AFRICA CAUSED BY POVERTY
Today we are told that ridiculously large numbers of family in Africa are HIV positive and will die of AIDS unless treated. These statistics are not counts of relatives who have in actual fact tested positive. It is an estimation generated from
a taste population. The sample population is primarily pregnant women, who are the ones who return with priority for medical treatment in poor countries. But pregnancy is specified to be a source for false positive results on HIV tests. And
individuals of African descent in standard are more likely to assessment false positive.
The World Health Organization does not require a positive HIV test for the diagnosis of AIDS within Africa. All that is required is a indubitable number of symptoms. But all of these symptoms can also be explained by hunger, malaria, and tuberculosis, conditions that have be health risks for Africans
long formerly the invention of AIDS. The health of poor Africans would undoubtedly be superior with better food and sanitation.
But funding is very soon being geared towards labour of toxic AIDS medications to Africans a bit than for these basic essentials.
AIDS DEFINES ITSELF
Clearly several people enjoy died in this country and elsewhere as the result of a suppressed immune system. But the 29 AIDS-defining illnesses are not clean illnesses, and they all own previously documented causes and treatments.
Diagnosis of AIDS in a minute works like a formula. If you enjoy pneumonia and you test HIV distrustful, you are told you have pneumonia. If you own pneumonia and you test HIV positive, you are told you enjoy AIDS and you are treated with toxic
AIDS drugs. For those populace who are truly immune suppressed, there are other possible explanations for this phenomenon, and copious safe non-toxic therapy.
DRUGS AND MALNUTRITION CAUSE AIDS
If the true condition of AIDS is a suppressed immune system unable to scuffle off opportunistic infections, in attendance are many other factor that can cause this.
Drugs such as cocaine and crystal methane are agreed to suppress the immune system. These drugs were used extensively by several gay men in the 1970's and 1980's. Intravenous drug users who enjoy AIDS are said to be immune suppressed due to HIV, rather than due to the drug they own been injecting.
Corticosteroids and some antibiotics, commonly prescribed to drug addicts and promiscuous gay men, are also immune suppressive. Blood given to hemophiliacs and other transplant recipient used to be treated with immune suppressing
agents. Now beside a new style to treat this blood, AIDS among blood recipients have declined. Despite predictions of a worldwide epidemic, AIDS cases in the United States hold remained confined to its original primary risk groups: promiscuous
gay men and intravenous drug users. In the gay bash scene, drug use, malnutrition, and sleep deprivation verbs to be high risk factor for immune deficiency.
POPPERS CAUSE KAPOSI'S SARCOMA
Kaposi's Sarcoma is one of the AIDS-indicator diseases, but it primarily occur in gay men and not other AIDS groups. Nitrite inhalants or poppers, used extensively by gay men contained by the 70's and 80's, have be shown to cause Kaposi's Sarcoma (KS). KS is a cancer of the blood vessel. Nitrites are known
carcinogens. KS is usually see in gay men around the obverse, mouth, and in the lungs, adjectives sites of contact with nitrite fumes.
There are various recorded incidents of KS contained by HIV-negative gay men who used poppers. As the use of poppers decreased within the 90's, the incidence of KS also decreased. Poppers are still
used by masses gay men.
FEAR ALONE CAN CAUSE AIDS
Fear and anxiety is another factor that can suppress the immune system. Stress releases cortisol in the body. This cortisol is used to lend a hand break down tissues for the release of energy needed contained by a fight or flight situation. But prolonged
stress and anxiety creates extraordinarily high level of cortisol in the body.
Cortisol have been shown to suppress the immune system and terminate T cell counts. Irregular sleep or lack of sleep also increases cortisol level. Gay men who face nouns and hatred for their sexuality can experience chronic mistrust and anxiety. Intravenous drug users also face profoundly of chronic
fear and paranoia as division of their addiction. Testing positive for HIV itself can create huge amounts of fear within the person self diagnosed.
its called acne, but if your that worried procure it checked out.
The medicine and health information post by website user , ByeDR.com not guarantee correctness , is for informational purposes only and is not a substitute for medical advice or treatment for any medical conditions.
More Questions and Answers...