Should senior citizens be capable of drive reasonably?
Answer:
I agree beside the retest on an anual basis or after an disaster. It's not a right to be able to drive. Since you can't find a license because you have epilepsy or some other medical defence then in that is justification for revokeing license if an elderly person looses their faculty enough to become a exposure to him or herself and others.
Yes, I agree. But there's a lot more planning than meet the eye if the government be to plan for something like that.
I believe that at a unquestionable age they should be given a road test approaching that of a 16 year old when they first grasp their license to see if they are physically capable of driving. Sure, the majority of them can, but there's slightly a few out there who spawn it pretty dangerous.
near is a mandatory re-evaluation every few years in MN and after a entity hits a certain age (maybe 65, can't remember) the time between said test decreases as a soul gets elder.
IVE BEEN DRIVING 56 YEARS NEVER HAD AN ACCIDENT CAUSED THOUSANDS PMSL SOWWY
Not sure that annually is the correct time frame, but yes, I agree in more frequent trialling of seniors after a certain age or event.
There are also some obedient seminars that instruct seniors what to be especially aware of and situations to avoid.
Also make public transportation a short time cleaner and safer as a decent alternative to driving.
I say-so let the seniors drive!!
In PA, doctors are required to report it to the DOT is a senior is no longer competent to drive. I have no opinion how the compliance is,but, yes, i do favor some way to periodically retest senior citizens.
I am for anything which help promote safety on the higway.
There should definately be a an age sunhat
http://e0ns.com
Families should be aware of their parents capabilities of driving and pilfer the cars from them. Joe citizen should call the cops if they see a senior driving confused. Same rules you would use for a teen driver.
Most seniors don't enjoy a cell phone glued to their ear, make them just a short time safer than some of the others. One wreck in 50 years doing a tour, rear finished at a stop light by a 27 year antediluvian. At 58 drove myself from NC to Idaho without a hitch.
I agree a re-test at 65 would hang on to our roads safer
You ask a good interview. I am guessing that perhaps your examine is sparked by recent media coverage of accident caused by elder drivers.
While after age 85, declining capacity have be shown to have an affect on ability of older drivers, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's research shows that "younger drivers are considerably more imagined to be involved in a crash than are elder drivers. In fact, the per-person crash involvement rate decrease as age increases until drivers reach 85 or more years of age. Even this age group have a per-driver crash rate lower than drivers younger than 50 years of age."
Most "senior citizens" are good drivers. Just resembling those in younger age groups, at hand are some that have poor skills --for elder drivers these problems are due to declining capacity such as loss of vision or audible range.
Because our country lacks a good comprehensive system of public transportation and because to most Americans "independence" is connected to being competent to own a vehicle and the ability to drive it--much thoughtful consideration must be given to address the needs of elder Americans who need to drive within order to do their business and remain affianced in life span. Isolation of our older friends and neighbors maim the spirit and kills more smartly than a disease like cancer!
Testing the skills of elder drivers is a good idea--particulary if the senior human being behind the rudder is involved in an infraction that puts others at risk. Putting an age restriction on an elder person's privilege to drive is an idea that appears to smack of age discrimation and will own other unpleasant unintended consequences for seniors who depend on their wheels and their family.
Check out the information at the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's website. Wishing you safe travels!
It ain't ever the years, hon, it's the mileage.... and for sure after, speak 65 an annual check would certainly be fine.... I've be in pay for of kids (18) who go bonkers, stop within the middle of a highway, because they can't see or can't figure it out, and 80+ who are fine, but you are right, as we age, our repercussion time goes down. And some of that problem is because lots of culture are on meds that lower their attention levels. As in good health, we ought to make it dishonest to drive, and talk on a cell phone.... My state is almost to do that.... When a 30 year old drives while chitchat, studies have shown that their ability are those of an 85 year old.... And everyone ought to be regularly, no issue what their age.
In our newspaper in that was a report that some female was driving and discussion on her cell. Some one honked at her. And she shouted back, "Godamnit, I'm on the PHONE!" Believe that???? (She get arrested.)
I think here should be an age limit or when you are 70 and elder you should go for a check-up experiment every 6 months to a year. I hate it how matured people suppose they own the road. I agree with you!