How would I experiment to see if magnets really cured diseases?

Answers:    You could use the scientific method.

First, ask a request for information or state a problem that can be answered by science. You've already sorta done that, but it's better when your question looks for a comparison between two quantity. The more specific the question is, the better. For example, you might ask "How does the number of magnets worn on the right wrist of 25-30 year-old flu patients affect the rate of their repossession?" By making the question especially specific, you set definite boundaries on the experiment that prevent you from have to test too copious variables at one time.

Next, conduct research. It could be that the answer to your question have already been discovered, and even if it hasn't, you might cram something valuable in the region of how to proceed with your experiment.

You'll want to brand a hypothesis, which is a statement tentatively proposing a link between two variables. For example, your hypothesis could be that "increasing the number of magnets worn by flu patients between the ages of 25 and 30 significantly increases the speed of their recouping." If you don't think that's the defence, you could just as effortlessly turn your hypothesis in the conflicting direction. In either skin, you want to have a prediction to guide your research.

Next, design and conduct an experiment. You necessitate an independent variable (something you manipulate) and you stipulation to monitor the effect of the independent variable on the dependent unstable (something you measure). In this experiment, for example, your independent variable could be the number or strength of magnets worn by patients suffering from a extraordinary disease. Both are quantifiable values. The dependent irregular would be the patient's health, so you would enjoy to establish a widely-acceptable numerical scale to find that. That will depend on how focused your experiment is. Do you judge forgiving health by have the patient evaluate his well-being on a ascend of 1 to 10, or do you actually count white blood cell and look for antibodies to various pathogens?

You also call for a control group. A control group is one that you use for the purpose of comparison. For example, you might want to monitor the health of flu patients who don't wear any magnets (as long as they bump into the other criteria for your study). Your control group helps to show a dignified probability that your dependent variable is mortal affected by your independent changeable, and not by some other factor.

In designing your experiment, you'll want to get the assistance of other scientists. They can lend expert counsel that might prove critical to your experiment.

Once you've performed your experiment and collected the information, you'll want to organize it and complete any necessary calculation. This is where you'll be drawing abundantly of graphs and charts to display the relationships you've investigated.

Next, you make your conclusion. You can reject a hypothesis if the facts don't support it, but hypotheses can never be completely proven. That's where the subsequent step comes in.

Publish your results. Even if your hypothesis be wrong, that information will be valuable to the quantifiable community. Remember that we often swot more from our failures than from our successes. If the background DO support your hypothesis, other scientists will want to verify it. The more scientists replicate your results, the more weight they will take. Who knows? There may be a Nobel prize surrounded by your future.

Good luck!

EDIT: Crouching F150 make an excellent point. In studies like this, chiefly when either the researcher or the participant might WANT the magnets to be influential, it's better to do what's called a "double-blind" study. That's where on earth neither the researcher nor the participants know which participant are getting real magnets, and which are getting fiddle "placebo" magnets. The idea is that if you can't bring up to date the difference between the two groups, then there's no authenticity to the idea that hold influenced their health surrounded by any way.
It's be done. Unless you mean nanomagnets and are discussion about the cellular plane, they're more or less bunk.

The prescription and health information post by website user , not guarantee correctness , is for informational purposes lone and is not a substitute for medical advice or treatment for any medical conditions.

Related Questions and Answers
  • Bones: Gladioulus?
  • How long will marijuana be detected contained by a swab drug examination? I hold crohns and it help my condition deeply.?
  • Would you be upset if the cures are certain but the organization suppresses it for population control?
  • 20 minutes or 3 weeks?
  • Does a medication of antibiotic exposed out of its foil covering lose it's potency, even if it's not expired?
  • Does science make happen as tons problems as it prevents?