Is it true that breakthrough medical research have proved that doing research on rats cause cancer contained by rats?
Answer:
Yes and no. For example, some kinds of cancer that ONLY occur within rats have be found. It was widely believed that saccharin or cyclamates (I forget which one) cause cancer, but the fact be that rats digest, process and eliminate it differently than we do. When it is concentrated within their urine, it forms crystals, which it does not do in our urine because our urine contains a greater percentage of water. (A human next to water level in the urine as low as a rat's would already be insensible of dehydration.)
The sharp-edge crystals in the rats' bladders repeatedly cut them and cause bleeding, required healing, and eventually lead to a breakdown of the healing process, beside uncontrolled cell growth and reproduction, called cancer-- because the bladders be continually being cut by the sharp-edged crystals and need to be healed...! So it be not that the sweetener caused cancer. ANYTHING that crystallized contained by their urine like that would eventually enjoy caused cancer.
The rats basically couldn't tell us, that's adjectives.
Stop medical experiments on mute animals-- experiment on PETA members, instead.
THOSE WORTHY OF OUR RESPECT WOULD VOLUNTEER.
11 DEC 06, 1851 hrs, GMT.
this is probly a practical joke question(?)but--having had copious rats and mice over the years,i can tell u that EVERY-and i do tight-fisted 100% of them-rodent that i ever had,died of cancer within its old age.u could see the tumours,and they'd hold to be put down.in the crazed,they are predated by almost everything-owls,foxes,u name it.they dont live long satisfactory to develop the disease.but 3 year old mice and 5 yr antiquated rats are extraordinarily prone to cancer in my belief.ive often wondered if those test are skewed-i mean,be it the diet they were feed.or the chemicals they ingested in the lab-or,approaching my pets,was it newly that rodents are cancer prone to begin next to??