If within be a surgery that stopped the aging of adjectives of your cell would you stir through near it?
Answers: Ichigo:
As a physican that enjoys nifty food about 6 times a year, I guess I could tolerate living minus fast food.
Would I stir through the treatment? At my age, I don't think so....why be an prehistoric man for an eternity? Maybe if I were 20, I'd consider it, but at that age I did chomp through fast food most of the time!
I'd be contained by favor of such a therapy simply if the cultural and political climate were one which nurtured the massive increase contained by population. That is why I am a physican, I seek to increase my little cultural and political climate by helping my patients feel better and live better. Only after are they free to make choices influenced by their minds and heart, not their vigour (or lack of health).
Now, the plea we age is due to our chromosomes getting shorter - we have double stranded DNA that get shorter with respectively cell replication until it finally starts screwing up the notes with respectively replication.
Cancer is when cell replication goes haywire as very well - but the cells keep hold of making similar genetic codes, they just hold turned off the everyday control mechanisms. Heart disease is not so much a cellular replication disease as one of inheritance, diet, and overall health. Let's not forget things resembling Chagas disease, the effects of high blood pressure, or trustworthy viruses that induce myopathy.
So you aren't really asking a medical cross-question as much as a moral or philosophical question. We already hold gene therapies that use virus like the adjectives cold to attempt to change chromosomal abnormality and improve someone's form. No real progress, some advance and some set-backs, but no proven therapies that we would approaching to implement on a planetary scale.
The effects of living - accident, viral illnesses, parasitic infestations, the wearing out of your kidneys, your lungs, etc - would end up bloodshed you even after such a therapy even if cancer, heart disease, and aging be out of the equation. You'd just be deeply older by the time you'd die, so in that would be many more ancestors on the planet.
Still, who wouldn't want to see six generations of their loved ones all at one time? Imagine!
LOL, sounds close to a trick question! I would unambiguously stop the aging and prevent diseases.
The medicine and strength information post by website user , ByeDR.com not guarantee correctness , is for informational purposes only and is not a substitute for medical guidance or treatment for any medical conditions.
Related Questions and Answers