Do I hold other option for thoracic spinal radiology?
At this point, though, physical dream therapy and a TENS unit own done nothing whatsoever to stave the dull pain or to help me get better at all. I know that depending on the angle, nearby is a chance that the radiology that I've have thus far could be missing something.
Are there any other types of imaging that may give a hand to see something that these other ones have missed? I know that there's CTs, PET scan, fluoroscopy, ultrasound, and probably others that I can't think of right very soon, but I don't know much about them and whether they could dianose anything bright around my thoracic spine.
Anyone have any thoughts or suggestions? Luckily I live surrounded by a city and there are possible many option around here if I knew what to ask in the region of anyway.
Answers: One procedure you didn't list is a myelogram. It involves the injection of dye into the sac that surrounds the spinal cord & nerves followed by an CT. Radiologists can take a really good look at the nerves that passageway. I know they can diagnose disc rupture & compression using a myelogram when other scans come to nothing to show a problem. Bone scans can detect fractures that might not otherwise show too.
Without knowing the extent of your spasm I find it difficult to recommend a course of action.
Is your backache confined to your back or is it radicular surrounded by quality? By radicular I am referring to niggle associated with sassiness root injury. Typically nerve root injury will own pain that follows the distribution of the brass neck that originates from the rank of the spine that is involved.
MRI is considered the best immaging technique for spinal injuries; but infer this: studies continue to show that a surprisingly big number of patirents who have rear legs pain do not enjoy demonstratable abnormalities on MRI. Conversely, some patients can hold MRI evidence of disease ( such as disc injuries) and have no symptoms. It is encouraging that the MRI is middle-of-the-road as major injuries would be picked up. I doubt other imaging studies can afford a better picture.
A radiologist once told me that CT scans be much better at picking up muscle and soft tissue injury, whereas a MRI was better at picking up a spinal injury. One procedure you didn't record is a myelogram. It involves the injection of dye into the sac that surrounds the spinal cord & nerves followed by an CT. Radiologists can get a really moral look at the nerves that way. I know they can diagnose disc rupture & compression using a myelogram when other scan fail to show a problem. Bone scan can detect fractures that might not otherwise show too.
Honestly, I think the most exalted factor in radiologic studies are the radiology techs and radiologists themselves. It's amazing how some are so much more adept at "catching" things than others. I'd try to find a radiologist who specialized surrounded by spines and back injuries. They are out in that...especially in key cities.
Hope this helps...and that you avoid surgery!
a bone scan could detect a small vertebral body fracture or a hairline fracture that might enjoy been missed on mri or plain films, although it's doubtful that a small fracture similar to that could cause such severe rear pains. based on your statement that previous mri and x-rays be normal, i'd own to agree with the guess that it's either muscle or ligamentous injury.
could it be something else entirely approaching shingles?
I believe it is highly promising you could be significantly helped by a appropriate chiropractor who practices microadjustments, a system known as Network Spinal Analysis. I reflect on if you do a web prod for Network Spinal Analysis AND your city and state, you should be able to find someone implicit who practices it.
The medicine and condition information post by website user , ByeDR.com not guarantee correctness , is for informational purposes only and is not a substitute for medical guidance or treatment for any medical conditions.
Related Questions and Answers