Why would two different doctors grant two different cause of a disease or outcome?

The hazards of the undedescended testis: 1. sterlity 2. Pain. liable to repeated injury. 3.hernia is possible 4. Torsion of the spermatic cord. 5. Sometimes within will be Epidydymo -orchitis 6. it may atrophy. 7. increased liability to malignancy, would this risk be greater if surgery was done incorrectly? Stones are not due to the undescended testis but due to excess of milk since the milk contains calcium and the stones might be due to calcium oxalate crystals, they be not. How could you prove what it was cause from, when it is very unusual surrounded by the first place. It would be interesting to know if it was a doctor answering the request for information and where they practice tablets at? An expert pediatric urologist said that the stones were cause from the negligent surgery to fix the undescended testes at age two that did not fix the testes and be then gone untreated for several years, and not the milk, how could you say that this is not true? what evidence do you hold to support your answer?

Answers:
ask this question to a third doctor

A diagnosis is solely a science of educated guesses congruent symptoms of the patient to symptoms of set disease states. This is the reason you are provoked to get second and third opinion.

ByeDr.com

Why would two different doctors grant two different cause of a disease or outcome?

Topic