With adjectives the medical breakthroughs, why hasn't artificial blood be developed?
Answer:
Artificial blood was developed surrounded by the early 1966 by Leland C. Clark, Jr., of the University of Cincinnati, which be a liquid flurocarbon. I be using it in the rash 1970's in the precipitate stages of heart transplantation research to attempt to mitigate tissue rejection. Since then, tons approaches to artificial blood have be developed, including one recently by Genentec. The problem is that blood is a complex tissue next to many different functions, and respectively artificial prototype cannot possibly replace all those functions. However, as an infusion to replace blood loss, when blood donors are not available, it have possible usefulness.
Below is a reference you might want to explore
they hold go to this website
Scientists within Australia have created synthetically created blood. The blood is TRUE - it is not synthetic.
Sometimes scientific discoveries do not return with the publicity they deserve. A chemical called CGK733 have been shown to be capable of reverse the aging process in cell chromosomes which is HUGE communication - have you hear of it?
Artifiical blood actually exists
There are currently Perfluorocarbon base (2)
and Hemoglobin based (5-8) Blood substitutes and abundant are in Phase III Human clinical trials within US but are not currently apoproved by FDA. Also scientists are studying whether stem cells are another source of artificial blood
creating a blood substitute is exceedingly difficult. you try creating something that adequately perform all the functions of a humble red blood cell. gas transport, regulating plasma pH, unstable oxygen affinity curve. these are very tricky to do.
A company called NFLD on the NASDAQ come close to doing this. The blood substitute was tried within clinical trials in an emergency setting which confused things. It will pinch longer to see if it has life span saving meaning.
there is too copious components to blood they cant replicate it